by ktimm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:18 pm
May I ask why ? We can have an open dialogue , so let us know what you don't like about the new one.
In my opinion, having used all three the new one is superior in most instances, and this is considering I liked the original one a lot.
Here are the primary differences based on capability:
Old Talons 5 Pockets ( hydration, small long, chamber long, interior security, exterior security). Of these, hydration, small and long were easy to use, the others were more difficult. Compression was a small top compression
New Talon 3 pockets (hydration, main chamber, mini lid) All are very easy to use. In addition you can add org pockets inside if desired, or take of the lid. Compression is a bungie, plus under lid, near bottom or optionally over the top straps.
Here is why I consider the new one superior.
- It is easier to fully utilize the capacity of the main chamber, and even over stuff if need be. The long zipper, meant a bit more work for stuffing gear, especially as you got near capacity, or it was something like a puffy
- The smaller long pocket, was very useful, but IMO not as useful as the small lid. Stuff could sort of fall out when oriented vertically, where the new lid flips over and small items stay secure.
- The newer one can compress smaller, due to the compression
- The newer one is easier to stuff a jacket on due to bungie compression , and top lid, or by using over the top straps.
- The lid is transferrable, so it can be added to your pack bag instead, for quick access gear
- With the numerous capabilities to compress on the new one, you can put a small sit pad at the bottom, and a jacket at the top, or on the side. A lot more options.
- The new one is far more weather proof
- This sounds a bit odd, but I think the new one, is far better for more "Urban use". You can fit books, a small laptop and stuff like that in it, where the other one you could not.
Now the downside to the new one, as was mentioned the velcro closure can be loud. I was turkey hunting yesterday and found it loud but it was easy to mitigate by flipping one side of the material in and then rolling down, then it pretty quite with very little noise (less than a zipper) when opening. We can also do it with just a stiffener if desired instead of velcro.
I believe the harness is a bit better on the new one as well. It has more adjustment.
Personally, I'd rather add a side zip to the new one, then offer 3 versions of Day Talons. From a pure business perspective, and I'm being real honest here, the old one was a loss leader, and basically volunteer work on our part as it was rather labor intensive. If we did offer it again, it would need to be much pricier, or have a big enough run to get costing down. Unfortunately, some of those are not really our "ethos" . We believe in making highly weather resistant, highly adaptable, high quality products at what we consider a very fair price. Honestly, if you look at out packs, which I would certainly consider expedition capable, they are no more expensive than an expedition Gregory, or Osprey at full retail (less in fact). In fact, the Unaweep, is closer in price to the weekender backpacks at regular retail prices.
So lets have a discussion on what you desire. Is it the day pack function or the dual long pockets ? We can do dual long pockets in a non day pack pretty easily. It is our desire to offer a product that works great for everyone. Unfortunately for us, the original Day Talon did not work well for us, at a price we thought was a fair price for it. Personally, I don't think a day pack needs to be $200 or $250.