Backpack Suspension Design
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:56 am
There has been a lot of chatter and a bit of ruckus lately about backpack suspension design. I'd like to clear up our position and explain our assertions. This will be a very high level discussion of how different backpack designs perform when carrying loads over 60 lbs.
INTERNAL FRAME:
Internal frame packs were first developed by Greg Lowe in 1967.
I have asserted that traditional internal frames are not designed to carry heavy loads comfortably. To understand why, we need to conceptualize what is happening with that frame system while at rest and while loaded.
This is a simplified version of a traditional internal frame with hipbelt. Notice the wedge shape to the backpack stays, and how they terminate in the back - or lumbar region - of the hipbelt.
When loaded heavily, this wedge shaped frame transfers all the weight to a narrow region on the belt, tending to cause deformation as seen below.
I have experienced this extensively with backpacks in the past. Before developing the Paradox frame system I owned 25 or more high end backpacks chasing a load hauling platform that performed the way I wanted, and I finally came to realize that it didn't exist.
The problem with this design is the load transfer via two narrow points to a single area on the belt, causing the tendency of the belt to deform and slip down. That deformation will continue until the downward force reaches equilibrium.
Equilibrium in this case is gained when the downward force is equaled by the upward force of the lumbar pad resting on the glutes, and by the lift of the belt hanging off the hips. This is very evident in the side profile sketch above.
These forces can cause massive discomfort. In order to keep the belt from slipping downward I am forced to continually tighten the hipbelt. Over time the belt slips, forcing me to adjust and tighten it again.
The deformation in the belt causes another issue. Because the frame has slipped down your back the torso adjustment is now too short for you. So you either need to tough it out and carry more weight on your shoulders, or you need to adjust the torso for different pack weights.
In a worst case example the result of carrying a heavy load with this pack design is bruised hips, limited leg lift due to the belt riding lower than it should, constant fidgeting and adjusting of the pack, and sore shoulders from a lack of shoulder lift.
ANATOMY:
People claim that pack fit and hipbelt design is a personal preference based on anatomical differences.
Well, it is and it isn't.
If you are blessed with a deep lumbar curve and/or large glutes then the internal frame diagrammed above can work just fine for you at large loads.
How? Because the downward force of the load reaches equilibrium on the lumbar shelf much sooner than it does for someone who doesn't have a deep lumbar curve.
We will touch on anatomy again after talking about the Paradox Frame
INTERNAL FRAME:
Internal frame packs were first developed by Greg Lowe in 1967.
I have asserted that traditional internal frames are not designed to carry heavy loads comfortably. To understand why, we need to conceptualize what is happening with that frame system while at rest and while loaded.
This is a simplified version of a traditional internal frame with hipbelt. Notice the wedge shape to the backpack stays, and how they terminate in the back - or lumbar region - of the hipbelt.
When loaded heavily, this wedge shaped frame transfers all the weight to a narrow region on the belt, tending to cause deformation as seen below.
I have experienced this extensively with backpacks in the past. Before developing the Paradox frame system I owned 25 or more high end backpacks chasing a load hauling platform that performed the way I wanted, and I finally came to realize that it didn't exist.
The problem with this design is the load transfer via two narrow points to a single area on the belt, causing the tendency of the belt to deform and slip down. That deformation will continue until the downward force reaches equilibrium.
Equilibrium in this case is gained when the downward force is equaled by the upward force of the lumbar pad resting on the glutes, and by the lift of the belt hanging off the hips. This is very evident in the side profile sketch above.
These forces can cause massive discomfort. In order to keep the belt from slipping downward I am forced to continually tighten the hipbelt. Over time the belt slips, forcing me to adjust and tighten it again.
The deformation in the belt causes another issue. Because the frame has slipped down your back the torso adjustment is now too short for you. So you either need to tough it out and carry more weight on your shoulders, or you need to adjust the torso for different pack weights.
In a worst case example the result of carrying a heavy load with this pack design is bruised hips, limited leg lift due to the belt riding lower than it should, constant fidgeting and adjusting of the pack, and sore shoulders from a lack of shoulder lift.
ANATOMY:
People claim that pack fit and hipbelt design is a personal preference based on anatomical differences.
Well, it is and it isn't.
If you are blessed with a deep lumbar curve and/or large glutes then the internal frame diagrammed above can work just fine for you at large loads.
How? Because the downward force of the load reaches equilibrium on the lumbar shelf much sooner than it does for someone who doesn't have a deep lumbar curve.
We will touch on anatomy again after talking about the Paradox Frame